I've published a new article on Scholardarity, A Primer on Logic: Interlude, the latest installment of my introduction to formal logic. In it I explain some of the inadequacies of Aristotelian logic.
Also, in case you missed Parts 1, 2 and 3, which respectively cover logical preliminaries, propositional logic, and Aristotelian logic, you can check them out here:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Showing posts with label Logic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Logic. Show all posts
Monday, February 27, 2012
Thursday, December 15, 2011
A Primer on Logic Part 3 (A New Scholardarity.com Article)
I've posted a new article, A Primer on Logic: Part 3, my new Scholardarity piece in which I give a brief introduction to Aristotelian logic. It's the latest entry in my introduction to formal logic.
Also, in case you missed Parts 1 and 2, which respectively cover logical preliminaries and propositional logic, you can check them out here:
Part 1
Part 2
If you have any comments / criticism, by all means share it!
Also, in case you missed Parts 1 and 2, which respectively cover logical preliminaries and propositional logic, you can check them out here:
Part 1
Part 2
If you have any comments / criticism, by all means share it!
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
A Primer on Logic: Part 2 (A New Scholardarity.com Article)
Check out "A Primer on Logic: Part 2", my new Scholardarity.com article which is essentially a crash-course in propositional logic. It's the latest entry in my introduction to formal logic. (Also available as a PDF.)
Also, in case you missed Part 1, which covers logical preliminaries and vocabulary, you can check it out here. (Also as a PDF.)
If anyone has any comments / criticism, by all means share it!
Also, in case you missed Part 1, which covers logical preliminaries and vocabulary, you can check it out here. (Also as a PDF.)
If anyone has any comments / criticism, by all means share it!
Sunday, August 7, 2011
A Dilemma for Dialetheism
I've just published a revised version of my article "A Dilemma for Dialetheism" on Scholardarity.com, which was originally published in the Spring 2010 edition of the Stanford undergraduate philosophy journal The Dualist (vol. 15). In the article I argue that dialetheists, who believe that some sentences are both true and false, either cannot express the notion that some sentences are not both true and false, or else that their accounts suffer from "revenge" liar paradoxes that not even they can regard as being both true and false. If you like logic and paradoxes as much as I do, please check it out and let me know what you think.
Labels:
Dialetheism,
Liar Paradox,
Logic,
Paradoxes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
